Sunday, November 4, 2007

An atheist turns to God

Unless you are a professional philosopher or a committed atheist, you probably have not heard of Antony Flew. Eighty-four years old and long retired, Flew lives with his wife in Reading, a medium-size town on the Thames an hour west of London. Over a long career he held appointments at a series of decent regional universities — Aberdeen, Keele, Reading — and earned a strong reputation writing on an unusual range of topics, from Hume to immortality to Darwin. His greatest contribution remains his first, a short paper from 1950 called “Theology and Falsification.” Flew was a precocious 27 when he delivered the paper at a meeting of the Socratic Club, the Oxford salon presided over by C. S. Lewis. Reprinted in dozens of anthologies, “Theology and Falsification” has become a heroic tract for committed atheists. In a masterfully terse thousand words, Flew argues that “God” is too vague a concept to be meaningful. For if God’s greatness entails being invisible, intangible and inscrutable, then he can’t be disproved — but nor can he be proved. Such powerful but simply stated arguments made Flew popular on the campus speaking circuit; videos from debates in the 1970s show a lanky man, his black hair professorially unkempt, vivisecting religious belief with an English public-school accent perfect for the seduction of American ears. Before the current crop of atheist crusader-authors — Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens — there was Antony Flew.

Flew’s fame is about to spread beyond the atheists and philosophers. HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollins, has just released “There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind,” a book attributed to Flew and a co-author, the Christian apologist Roy Abraham Varghese. “There Is a God” is an intellectual’s bildungsroman written in simple language for a mass audience. It’s the first-person account of a preacher’s son who, away at Methodist boarding school, defied his father to become a teenage atheist, later wrote on atheism at Oxford, spent his life fighting for unbelief and then did an about-face in his old age, embracing the truth of a higher power. The book offers elegant, user-friendly descriptions of the arguments that persuaded Flew, arguments familiar to anyone who has heard evangelical Christians’ “scientific proof” of God. From the “fine tuning” argument that the laws of nature are too perfect to have been accidents to the “intelligent design” argument that human biology cannot be explained by evolution to various computations meant to show that probability favors a divine creator, “There Is a God” is perhaps the handiest primer ever written on the science (many would say pseudoscience) of religious belief.

Flew’s “conversion,” first reported in late 2004, has cast him into culture wars that he contentedly avoided his whole life.
Read the rest from The New York Times Magazine here. I'll be commenting on this later.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The part of the article which is really frightening is the notion that Flew doesn't have a firm grasp of the topics that he supposedly wrote this book about. It's clear that it would be impossible for him to write the book he is credited with writing.

He's suffering from advanced senile dementia and he's being used by the actual authors of "his" book to remake him as an evangelism tool.

Beyond using the man for their own ends, which I find ghoulish... the other thing it says about Christianity is unfortunate.

It's basically making the statement about Christianity that the difference between an atheist and a believer is a few million brain cells. I strongly disagree with that statement, which makes Flew a very bad "poster child" for an atheist turned believer.

I'm sure some believers will be glad that Flew will be in heaven, and take his current mental incapacity as a gift from God that allows his salvation. I'd hope that number of believers would be low, but for those for whom "salvation" is the be all and end all of Christianity, a mind is a trifiling price to pay.

What a horrible thing this says about Christianity, that the testimony of a man turned simpleton is supposed to give comfort and weight to the truth value of the faith's supernatural claims. These are arguments so flawed, simplisitic, hole-riddled and faulty that no skeptic of mediocre scholarship would ever accept them, let alone Flew in his prime.

What a cult of personality this brand of Christianity is, that the arguments can be complete oatmeal, but the arguer, and his Oxford Pedigree stand head and shoulders above it as the prize.



I see this as merely the latest permutation of the "deathbed conversion" myths like the myth that Darwin recanted his theories while dying.

-Siamang